⚡ Bolt: Optimize cascadeFailure to O(N)#135
Conversation
Replaced `queue.shift()` with an index pointer in `TaskStateManager.cascadeFailure`. `Array.prototype.shift()` is O(N), making the BFS traversal O(N^2) in the worst case (fan-out). This change reduces the complexity to O(N). Benchmark results (50,000 fan-out tasks): Before: ~286ms After: ~67ms (~4.2x speedup) Co-authored-by: thalesraymond <32554150+thalesraymond@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Summary of ChangesHello @thalesraymond, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the performance of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a valuable performance optimization to the cascadeFailure method within TaskStateManager. By replacing the O(N) Array.prototype.shift() operation with an O(1) index-based approach to simulate a queue, the overall complexity for cascading failures is correctly reduced from O(N^2) to O(N). This is a significant improvement for scenarios with large, fan-out dependency graphs, as demonstrated by the provided metrics. The implementation is clean, correct, and a standard pattern for efficient breadth-first traversal in JavaScript. Additionally, this change has the positive side effect of removing a non-null assertion, which improves type safety. The change is excellent and ready to be merged.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |



💡 What: Replaced
queue.shift()with an index pointer inTaskStateManager.cascadeFailure.🎯 Why:
Array.prototype.shift()is O(N), making the BFS traversal O(N^2) in the worst case (fan-out). This was a bottleneck for large graphs.📊 Impact: Reduced execution time for 50,000 fan-out tasks from ~286ms to ~67ms (~4.2x speedup).
🔬 Measurement: Verified with a temporary benchmark
tests/bench_cascade_failure.test.ts(deleted before submission). All existing tests pass.PR created automatically by Jules for task 7087586738119827479 started by @thalesraymond