Skip to content

Fix codestyle check#112

Merged
MythicManiac merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
fix-codestyle-check
Dec 15, 2025
Merged

Fix codestyle check#112
MythicManiac merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
fix-codestyle-check

Conversation

@MythicManiac
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Walkthrough

The CI workflow was changed to install pre-commit with python -m pip install pre-commit instead of downloading/executing a local install script, and pre-commit is now invoked via the system pre-commit command on $PATH rather than a user-local path (e.g., ~/.bin/pre-commit or ~/bin/pre-commit). Separately, a source file (ThunderstoreCLI/Commands/BuildCommand.cs) received non-functional whitespace/style adjustments (spacing around casts and bitwise operations).

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess whether it relates to the changeset. Add a brief description explaining the codestyle fixes applied and why the changes were necessary.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: fixing codestyle issues across the codebase, which is clearly demonstrated by whitespace formatting adjustments in BuildCommand.cs and workflow configuration updates.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-codestyle-check

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfa7558 and 400711e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ThunderstoreCLI/Commands/BuildCommand.cs (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • ThunderstoreCLI/Commands/BuildCommand.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Build and test macOS-latest
  • GitHub Check: Build and test ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Build and test windows-latest

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 5.46%. Comparing base (f56192c) to head (400711e).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
ThunderstoreCLI/Commands/BuildCommand.cs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #112   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    5.46%   5.46%           
======================================
  Files          41      41           
  Lines        2416    2416           
  Branches      238     238           
======================================
  Hits          132     132           
  Misses       2281    2281           
  Partials        3       3           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@MythicManiac MythicManiac merged commit ae3656c into master Dec 15, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@MythicManiac MythicManiac deleted the fix-codestyle-check branch December 15, 2025 09:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant