This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 25, 2021. It is now read-only.
Fixed padding in the first convolutional layer#21
Open
alex4men wants to merge 1 commit intoudacity:masterfrom
Open
Fixed padding in the first convolutional layer#21alex4men wants to merge 1 commit intoudacity:masterfrom
alex4men wants to merge 1 commit intoudacity:masterfrom
Conversation
As stated in the comment, conv1 layer should have 'VALID' padding, but in the code (line 48) it had 'SAME' padding. That was confusing, and leaded to (?, 28, 28, 256) output shape of the conv2 layer, instead of (?, 27, 27, 256), as described in the original paper.
alex4men
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As stated in the comment, conv1 layer should have 'VALID' padding, but in the code (line 48) it had 'SAME' padding. That was confusing, and leaded to (?, 28, 28, 256) output shape of the conv2 layer, instead of (?, 27, 27, 256), as described in the original paper.