Skip to content

Conversation

@khalsz
Copy link
Collaborator

@khalsz khalsz commented Feb 5, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

@samueljackson92 samueljackson92 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great to me. @NathanCummings should add his opinion as he might have stronger feedback.

@NathanCummings
Copy link
Member

I have a few thoughts. Firstly, what do we think about the use of 'cpf'? Would it be more descriptive and make more sense to call it something like "shot-summary"?

@adam-parker1
Copy link
Collaborator

I have a few thoughts. Firstly, what do we think about the use of 'cpf'? Would it be more descriptive and make more sense to call it something like "shot-summary"?

I imagine it is mainly for historic use, I am not sure about other facilities but MAST and JET use CPF, I wouldn't be surprised if the other experiments do the same

@khalsz khalsz force-pushed the cpf-field-schema branch 2 times, most recently from fb18b27 to 1439c95 Compare February 14, 2025 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants