Update deployment script to point to current MCP AMI#97
Conversation
|
If we're trying to support older versions/deployments, no- we'd be using the old name. Once I've wrapped up the 1.32 troubleshooting, we should be able to kick SPS's eks_module ref up to the latest (and drop 1.29 altogether). |
LucaCinquini
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes I think @jpl-btlunsfo is right: we should wait for his updates before moving this SSM key altogether.
|
@jpl-btlunsfo, the link you sent is referencing the @LucaCinquini, what was the behavior you experienced? Looking at the scripts, it seems like MCP renaming the parameter should only have resulted in a warning. I don't see any Terraform that attempts to access |
|
I think it was some of our TF code that invoked that parameter? I don't have the error any more. |
|
We're also pointing at the |
Fixing nightly deployment which referenced only SSM parameter.
Looks like MCP removed the
/mcp/amis/aml2-eks-1-29AMI and replaced it with/mcp/amis/aml2023-eks-1-29. The nightly deploy script removes the SSM parameter before creating it again and since the reference SSM didn't exist the unity SSM "/unity/account/eks/amis/aml2-eks-1-29" was removed.@jpl-btlunsfo, @LucaCinquini is it OK to keep the old "Unity" SSM name or do we need to update it to aml2023 in all the scripts?