Apply fixes for onBuildComplete and route module #88831
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nextjs-bot
added
created-by: Next.js team
![vercel[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/8329?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Collaborator
Stats from current PR🔴 1 regression, 6 improvements
📊 All Metrics📖 Metrics GlossaryDev Server Metrics:
Build Metrics:
Change Thresholds:
⚡ Dev Server
📦 Dev Server (Webpack) (Legacy)📦 Dev Server (Webpack)
⚡ Production Builds
📦 Production Builds (Webpack) (Legacy)📦 Production Builds (Webpack)
📦 Bundle SizesBundle Sizes⚡ TurbopackClient Main Bundles: **432 kB** → **432 kB** ✅ -50 B82 files with content-based hashes (individual files not comparable between builds) Server Middleware
Build DetailsBuild Manifests
📦 WebpackClient Main Bundles
Polyfills
Pages
Server Edge SSR
Middleware
Build DetailsBuild Manifests
Build Cache
🔄 Shared (bundler-independent)Runtimes
📝 Changed Files (25 files)Files with changes:
View diffsapp-page-exp..ntime.dev.jsfailed to diffapp-page-exp..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-page-tur..ntime.dev.jsfailed to diffapp-page-tur..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-page-tur..ntime.dev.jsfailed to diffapp-page-tur..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-page.runtime.dev.jsfailed to diffapp-page.runtime.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-route-ex..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display app-route-ex..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-route-tu..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display app-route-tu..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-route-tu..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display app-route-tu..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display app-route.runtime.dev.jsDiff too large to display app-route.ru..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display pages-api-tu..ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display pages-api-tu..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display pages-api.runtime.dev.jsDiff too large to display pages-api.ru..time.prod.jsDiff too large to display pages-turbo...ntime.dev.jsDiff too large to display pages-turbo...time.prod.jsDiff too large to display pages.runtime.dev.jsDiff too large to display pages.runtime.prod.jsDiff too large to display server.runtime.prod.jsDiff too large to display |
ijjk
force-pushed
the
ijjk/adapters-updates
branch
from
4b934e3 to
e26b92e
Compare
Co-authored-by: vercel[bot] <35613825+vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
ijjk
force-pushed
the
ijjk/adapters-updates
branch
from
ff39053 to
7a81f0c
Compare
feedthejim
approved these changes
Jan 26, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This applies fixes for outputs in
onBuildCompletewith various slight differences from expected values. This also applies some fixes in the route-module interface to ensure we install the process handlers for PPR since currently that was done innext-serverwhich we want to get rid of and there was an edge case with query parsing logic in the route-module.Our E2E tests were run against this here to validate https://github.com/vercel/next.js/actions/runs/21324578779 and failures are matching existing failures on canary.
x-ref: nextjs/adapter-vercel#11
x-ref: vercel/vercel#14574