Update didDocument definition to remove ambiguous use of match and reference the DID data model section #249
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
wip-abramson
requested review from
ChristopherA,
danpape,
dmitrizagidulin,
mccown and
peacekeeper
as code owners
wip-abramson
added a commit
to wip-abramson/did-resolution
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This addresses #231 and #233.
The only part that is missing is the references are still going to DID 1.0 instead of 1.1. I think this is something to do with ReSpec and the fact that DID 1.1 is not a full standard yet. As soon as it is, I believe these references would update?
Preview | Diff