docs: feedback-from-Martas

[MT-superdev]

This is feedback from Martas.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @MT-superdev, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new documentation file, 'Improvement.md', which details comprehensive feedback from 'Martas' regarding the 'Watchflow' system. The document outlines 27 distinct areas for improvement, categorized into critical issues, technical debt, performance, monitoring, security, architecture, documentation, testing, feature enhancements, and bug fixes, along with a prioritized summary to guide future development efforts.

Highlights

• Agent Coordination: Watchflow agents currently work in isolation, leading to a lack of coordination for complex rules.
• Regression Prevention: The system frequently reports the same violations multiple times, causing notification spam.
• Error Handling: Critical errors are often masked as 'passed' states, making it difficult to identify and debug issues.
• Test Coverage: Significant parts of the Watchflow system lack automated tests, increasing the risk of undetected bugs.
• Learning Agent: The system does not learn from past decisions or developer feedback, leading to repeated false positives or negatives.
• Decision Orchestrator: A central orchestrator is missing to intelligently combine rule-based and AI-based decisions.
• Monitoring & Observability: There is a lack of implemented metrics and monitoring dashboards, hindering system health visibility.
• Validator Combinations: The system currently lacks the ability to combine rules using complex AND/OR logic for more sophisticated policies.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a comprehensive document outlining feedback and suggested improvements for the Watchflow project. The document is well-structured and provides valuable insights across various areas like architecture, security, and performance. My review focuses on improving the clarity and formatting of this new documentation file. I've suggested minor changes to headings, fixed formatting inconsistencies, and pointed out a couple of items in the priority summary that could be clarified for better consistency with the detailed sections.

[gemini-code-assist]

The heading 'I THINK these are ISSUES' sounds a bit uncertain. For a more confident and direct tone in this feedback document, consider rephrasing it to improve clarity and impact.

Suggested change

	## I THINK these are ISSUES (Must Fix Soon)
	## Critical Issues (Must Fix Soon)

[gemini-code-assist]

This line has trailing whitespace. Removing it will improve formatting consistency.

Suggested change

	- ❌ "Rule failed - violation found"
	- ❌ "Rule failed - violation found"

[gemini-code-assist]

This heading contains an extra space after ##. For consistent markdown formatting, it should be removed.

Suggested change

	## SECURITY & COMPLIANCE
	## SECURITY & COMPLIANCE

[gemini-code-assist]

This heading contains an extra space after ##. For consistent markdown formatting, it should be removed.

Suggested change

	## DOCUMENTATION & DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE
	## DOCUMENTATION & DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE

[gemini-code-assist]

The summary item 'Regression Prevention' is a bit vague and doesn't directly map to the detailed point #2 ('Same Violations Reported Multiple Times'). Consider using a more specific title to improve clarity and better reflect the content of point #2.

Suggested change

	2. **Regression Prevention** - Stop duplicate violation reports
	2. **Duplicate Violation Reporting** - Stop duplicate violation reports

[gemini-code-assist]

The item 'Enterprise Policies' is listed here in the priority summary, but it doesn't have a corresponding detailed section in the document above. This could cause confusion. To maintain consistency, please either add a detailed section for this point or remove this line from the summary.