Feedback solution matas #37

MT-superdev · 2026-01-05T06:36:23Z

This is PR for following task.

2. Same violations reported multiple times
4. Error handling states (pass / fail / error)
5. Abstract classes using `pass` instead of explicit errors
7. AND / OR rule composition
9. Caching strategy (clarity + configurability)

gemini-code-assist · 2026-01-05T06:36:57Z

Summary of Changes

Hello @MT-superdev, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the Watchflow system's robustness, configurability, and expressiveness. It addresses critical feedback points by preventing redundant violation notifications, clarifying processing outcomes with explicit states, enforcing stricter implementation of abstract methods, and enabling the creation of highly complex and flexible rules. Additionally, it introduces a configurable caching mechanism to optimize performance and resource management.

Highlights

Violation Deduplication: Implemented a ViolationTracker to prevent the same violations from being reported multiple times, reducing notification spam for developers. This tracker fingerprints violations based on their content and context, and filters out duplicates before they are posted to GitHub.
Enhanced Error Handling States: Introduced a new ProcessingState enum (PASS, FAIL, ERROR) to clearly distinguish between successful processing, detected violations, and system errors. The ProcessingResult model and all event processors have been updated to use this more granular state, improving clarity and debugging capabilities.
Strict Abstract Method Enforcement: Modified abstract methods across various base classes (e.g., BaseAgent, BaseEventProcessor, BaseProvider) to raise NotImplementedError instead of using pass. This ensures that subclasses explicitly implement required methods, preventing silent failures and improving code quality.
Advanced Rule Logic (AND/OR/NOT): Added support for complex boolean logic (AND, OR, NOT) in rule conditions through ConditionExpression and ConditionEvaluator. This allows for the creation of more sophisticated and flexible rules, enabling precise control over when rules are triggered.
Configurable Caching Strategy: Introduced a dedicated CacheConfig and updated the caching utility to be fully configurable via environment variables. This includes settings for global and default cache sizes, TTLs, and a master switch to enable/disable caching, providing better control over performance and resource usage.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	`/gemini review`	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	`/gemini summary`	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	`/gemini help`	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

gemini-code-assist

Code Review

This is an excellent pull request that addresses several important architectural and functional improvements as outlined in the task description. The introduction of violation deduplication, configurable caching, explicit pass/fail/error processing states, and complex condition logic (AND/OR/NOT) are all well-implemented and significantly enhance the system's robustness and maintainability. The replacement of pass with NotImplementedError in abstract classes is a great improvement for developer experience. The addition of comprehensive test suites for each of these new features is particularly commendable and ensures the changes are reliable. I have two minor suggestions for improving code clarity and semantic correctness in the event processors, but overall, this is a very strong contribution.

gemini-code-assist · 2026-01-05T06:38:51Z

src/event_processors/rule_creation.py

+            class FeasibilityResult:
+                def __init__(self, is_feasible: bool, yaml_content: str, feedback: str):
+                    self.is_feasible = is_feasible
+                    self.yaml_content = yaml_content
+                    self.feedback = feedback
+
+            feasibility_result = FeasibilityResult(is_feasible, yaml_content, feedback)


Defining a class inside a method is generally discouraged as it can lead to code that is harder to understand, test, and maintain. For a simple data structure like this, consider using collections.namedtuple or a Pydantic BaseModel defined at the module level. This would make the code more idiomatic and improve readability.

gemini-code-assist · 2026-01-05T06:38:51Z

src/event_processors/violation_acknowledgment.py

+            # Determine state: PASS if valid acknowledgment, FAIL if violations require fixes, ERROR if invalid
+            if evaluation_result["valid"]:
+                state = ProcessingState.PASS
+            elif evaluation_result.get("require_fixes"):
+                state = ProcessingState.FAIL
+            else:
+                state = ProcessingState.ERROR


The use of ProcessingState.ERROR here for an invalid user acknowledgment might be misleading. The ERROR state is typically reserved for unexpected system failures (e.g., exceptions, timeouts), whereas an invalid acknowledgment is a form of user input error. Consider using ProcessingState.FAIL instead to indicate that the process completed but the user's action was not successful. This would provide a clearer semantic distinction between system errors and validation failures.

# If the acknowledgment is valid, the process passes. Otherwise, it fails. if evaluation_result["valid"]: state = ProcessingState.PASS else: state = ProcessingState.FAIL

dkargatzis · 2026-01-05T07:42:27Z

@MT-superdev could you please address the issues shown in PR checks?

codecov-commenter · 2026-01-06T16:50:51Z

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 21.46341% with 322 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (21.4%) is below the target coverage (80.0%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.
❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (31.9%) is below the target coverage (80.0%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main     #37     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   32.8%   31.9%   -1.0%     
=======================================
  Files         85      89      +4     
  Lines       5162    5530    +368     
=======================================
+ Hits        1698    1766     +68     
- Misses      3464    3764    +300

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f5a3be1...e691a91. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

dkargatzis · 2026-01-06T16:51:00Z

/gemini review

gemini-code-assist

Code Review

This pull request is a substantial and high-quality contribution that addresses several key architectural and functional issues outlined in Improvement.md. The introduction of a ProcessingState enum for clearer error handling, replacing pass with NotImplementedError in abstract classes, implementing a violation deduplication mechanism, adding a configurable caching strategy, and supporting complex AND/OR logic for rules are all excellent improvements. The code is well-structured, and the inclusion of comprehensive test suites for each new feature is commendable. My review includes a few suggestions for improving maintainability and consistency.

gemini-code-assist · 2026-01-06T16:53:33Z

Improvement.md

@@ -0,0 +1,405 @@
+# Watchflow Improvements
+
+## I THINK these are ISSUES (Must Fix Soon)


For consistency and professionalism, consider standardizing the capitalization of headings. Using Title Case for all main headings would improve readability.

For example:

## I THINK these are ISSUES (Must Fix Soon) could become ## High-Priority Issues

## TECHNICAL DEBT (Code Quality Issues) could become ## Technical Debt

## PRIORITY SUMMARY could become ## Priority Summary

gemini-code-assist · 2026-01-06T16:53:33Z

src/event_processors/pull_request.py

+            pr_data = task.payload.get("pull_request", {})
+            pr_number = pr_data.get("number")
+            context = (
+                {
+                    "pr_number": pr_number,
+                    "commit_sha": pr_data.get("head", {}).get("sha"),
+                    "branch": pr_data.get("head", {}).get("ref"),
+                }
+                if pr_number
+                else {}
+            )


This logic for building the context dictionary for violation tracking is duplicated in PushProcessor and ViolationAcknowledgmentProcessor. To improve maintainability and reduce code duplication, consider extracting this into a shared helper function. For example, you could create a function build_context_from_task(task: Task) -> dict that inspects the task's event type and payload to construct the appropriate context.

gemini-code-assist · 2026-01-06T16:53:33Z

src/rules/loaders/github_loader.py

+            try:
+                condition_expr = ConditionExpression.from_dict(rule_data["condition"])
+                logger.debug(f"Parsed condition expression for rule: {rule_data['description']}")
+            except Exception as e:


Catching a broad Exception can mask unexpected bugs. It's better to catch more specific exceptions that you anticipate from parsing the condition dictionary, such as ValueError, KeyError, or Pydantic's ValidationError. This makes the error handling more robust.

Suggested change

except Exception as e:

except (ValueError, KeyError, TypeError) as e:

MT-superdev added 8 commits December 31, 2025 07:34

docs: feedback from Matas

fa232c8

fix: change pass to raise NotImplementedError

baa2caa

chore: fixed file location

50141f8

chore: changed file location

a7c5f33

fix: fixed error handling( improvement 4)

aa2ad3b

fix: fixed caching strategy(improvement 9)

93726b0

fix: fixed same violations reported multiple times(improvement 2)

d9d5372

fix: combine rules with and/or logic(improvement 7)

695609d

MT-superdev requested a review from dkargatzis as a code owner January 5, 2026 06:36

gemini-code-assist bot reviewed Jan 5, 2026

View reviewed changes

MT-superdev added 4 commits January 5, 2026 09:21

chore: fixed pre-commit issue

a92d181

fix: fixed issues in PR checks

30c95fe

fix: fixed pytest error

ae41d65

fix: fixed models for testing issue

44cb8c4

gemini-code-assist bot reviewed Jan 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

fix: fixed pre commit error

e691a91

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Feedback solution matas #37

Feedback solution matas #37

Uh oh!

MT-superdev commented Jan 5, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 5, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 5, 2026

Uh oh!

dkargatzis commented Jan 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Jan 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

dkargatzis commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

		@@ -0,0 +1,405 @@
		# Watchflow Improvements

		## I THINK these are ISSUES (Must Fix Soon)

	except Exception as e:
	except (ValueError, KeyError, TypeError) as e:

Feedback solution matas #37

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Feedback solution matas #37

Uh oh!

Conversation

MT-superdev commented Jan 5, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Summary of Changes

Highlights

Footnotes

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Code Review

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 5, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 5, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

dkargatzis commented Jan 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Jan 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

dkargatzis commented Jan 6, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Code Review

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot Jan 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

dkargatzis commented Jan 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov-commenter commented Jan 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading