Skip to content

Add missing test scenarios#1238

Open
Tharsanan1 wants to merge 1 commit intowso2:mainfrom
Tharsanan1:codex/token-ratelimit-empty-array-it
Open

Add missing test scenarios#1238
Tharsanan1 wants to merge 1 commit intowso2:mainfrom
Tharsanan1:codex/token-ratelimit-empty-array-it

Conversation

@Tharsanan1
Copy link
Contributor

@Tharsanan1 Tharsanan1 commented Feb 18, 2026

Purpose

$subject

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced test coverage for token-based rate limiting to verify proper handling of gzipped backend responses and token consumption validation.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 18, 2026

Walkthrough

A test scenario is added to the token-based rate limiting feature file to validate that token consumption works correctly with gzip-encoded responses from backend services. The scenario includes setup steps to create templates and providers, configuration of rate limits, and verification of token depletion and rate limit enforcement across three sequential requests.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Token-based Rate Limiting Test Scenario
gateway/it/features/token-based-ratelimit.feature
Adds a new scenario validating token extraction from gzipped backend responses, including request execution, token consumption verification, and rate limit blocking behavior. Note: scenario appears to be duplicated within the file.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 A gzip test hops into view,
Token-draining in chunks, tried and true,
Three requests dance, then locked away,
Rate limits enforce their say,
Compression and quotas, now tested today! 📦

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is severely incomplete, containing only a template placeholder '$subject' with no actual information provided against the comprehensive required template. Complete the description with Purpose, Goals, Approach, User stories, Documentation, Automation tests, Security checks, Samples, Related PRs, and Test environment sections as specified in the template.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Add missing test scenarios' accurately reflects the main change: adding a new test scenario for token-based rate limiting with gzipped responses.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
gateway/it/features/token-based-ratelimit.feature (1)

373-374: Use Given instead of And for the header-clear teardown step.

And inherits the preceding Then keyword, making I clear all headers semantically appear as an assertion step. Given is the conventional keyword for state setup/teardown actions.

♻️ Proposed fix
-    And I clear all headers
-    Given I authenticate using basic auth as "admin"
+    Given I clear all headers
+    And I authenticate using basic auth as "admin"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@gateway/it/features/token-based-ratelimit.feature` around lines 373 - 374,
Replace the "And" keyword with "Given" for the teardown/setup step so the step
reads "Given I clear all headers" instead of "And I clear all headers"; update
the Gherkin scenario line containing "I clear all headers" (which currently
precedes "I authenticate using basic auth as \"admin\"") to use the Given
keyword to make it a proper state setup/teardown step.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@gateway/it/features/token-based-ratelimit.feature`:
- Around line 367-371: Add a response body assertion to the POST step that
currently only checks status 429: locate the "When I send a POST request to
\"http://localhost:8080/gzip-response/chat/completions?model=gpt-4&total_tokens=1\"
with body:" step and, alongside the existing "Then the response status code
should be 429" assertion, add the same body check used elsewhere (e.g., "And the
response body should contain \"Rate limit exceeded\"") so the error message is
verified.

---

Nitpick comments:
In `@gateway/it/features/token-based-ratelimit.feature`:
- Around line 373-374: Replace the "And" keyword with "Given" for the
teardown/setup step so the step reads "Given I clear all headers" instead of
"And I clear all headers"; update the Gherkin scenario line containing "I clear
all headers" (which currently precedes "I authenticate using basic auth as
\"admin\"") to use the Given keyword to make it a proper state setup/teardown
step.

Comment on lines +367 to +371
When I send a POST request to "http://localhost:8080/gzip-response/chat/completions?model=gpt-4&total_tokens=1" with body:
"""
{}
"""
Then the response status code should be 429
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Missing response body assertion on the 429 response.

Every other 429 in this file also asserts And the response body should contain "Rate limit exceeded" (lines 153, 797, 1102). The third request here only checks the status code, leaving the error message unverified.

🛠️ Proposed addition
     Then the response status code should be 429
+    And the response body should contain "Rate limit exceeded"
 
     And I clear all headers
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
When I send a POST request to "http://localhost:8080/gzip-response/chat/completions?model=gpt-4&total_tokens=1" with body:
"""
{}
"""
Then the response status code should be 429
When I send a POST request to "http://localhost:8080/gzip-response/chat/completions?model=gpt-4&total_tokens=1" with body:
"""
{}
"""
Then the response status code should be 429
And the response body should contain "Rate limit exceeded"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@gateway/it/features/token-based-ratelimit.feature` around lines 367 - 371,
Add a response body assertion to the POST step that currently only checks status
429: locate the "When I send a POST request to
\"http://localhost:8080/gzip-response/chat/completions?model=gpt-4&total_tokens=1\"
with body:" step and, alongside the existing "Then the response status code
should be 429" assertion, add the same body check used elsewhere (e.g., "And the
response body should contain \"Rate limit exceeded\"") so the error message is
verified.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments