discard unused uct_ep when the pre-created uct_ep more than needed#223
discard unused uct_ep when the pre-created uct_ep more than needed#223yosefe merged 1 commit intoyosefe:integration3from
Conversation
bb99ed5 to
8a10332
Compare
8a10332 to
95dc3d9
Compare
|
95dc3d9 to
8bb6068
Compare
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
How to run the below |
|
take care of the direcotry |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@yosefe Is it possible to review this PR before fixing the CI self problem? |
|
CI has been passed. |
|
@dmitrygx can you pls review? |
dmitrygx
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@changchengx did you use the latest code from master?
I see that some bugs came from the initial implementation.
So, I suggest you align this PR with the master branch.
|
@dmitrygx I've followed your 1st round CR comments to refine the implmentation. Please check it. |
dmitrygx
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shall we add ucp_worker_discard_uct_ep_cleanup to cleanup discarding hash in ucp_worker_destroy?
As we've talked offline, I'll add warning if the |
|
@yosefe Dmitry has approved this PR and he's in Hackathon these days. |
|
@yosefe Do you have any comments about this PR? |
yosefe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can we add CI to test this?
this branch has minimal ci infrastructure to run io_demo
@yosefe Do you mean to add test into |
|
2 short tests in io-demo.yaml , without interference, with different num_paths (2->1 and 1->2) |
|
@yosefe Does azure CI stop working? There's no CI triggered here. |
|
Two test cases have been added. |
|
@changchengx pls squash |
Signed-off-by: Changcheng Liu <jerrliu@nvidia.com>

What
keep NUM_PATHS compatible between server (e.g. UCX_IB_NUM_PATHS=1) and client (e.g. UCX_IB_NUM_PATHS=2)
This PR is mainly ported from: