Skip to content

Comments

CodeRabbit Generated Unit Tests: Generate unit tests for PR changes#33

Open
coderabbitai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
coderabbitai/utg/f73dfc3
Open

CodeRabbit Generated Unit Tests: Generate unit tests for PR changes#33
coderabbitai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
coderabbitai/utg/f73dfc3

Conversation

@coderabbitai
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Unit test generation was requested by @ysdede.

The following files were modified:

  • tests/mel-extended.test.mjs

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive test suite covering edge cases, boundary conditions, incremental processing scenarios, and streaming behavior to validate numerical stability and reliability across various input conditions.

Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@tests/mel-extended.test.mjs`:
- Around line 636-639: The test contains a tautological assertion: replace the
check of features length to validate it's equal to nMels times the returned
frame count; specifically, in the test that destructures { features, length }
from preprocessor.process(audio) and uses nMels, change the assertion from
expecting features.length to equal nMels * (features.length / nMels) to
expecting features.length toBe(nMels * length) so it actually verifies features
were produced for each mel bin per frame.
- Around line 192-207: The test currently guards assertions with a conditional
on featuresLen, which can silently skip assertions; replace the conditional
check with an explicit assertion using expect(featuresLen).toBe(1) right after
calling preprocessor.computeRawMel(audio), and then always call
preprocessor.normalizeFeatures(rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen) and run the
zero-checks on normalized so the test fails loudly when preconditions
(featuresLen === 1) aren't met; reference the variables/featuresLen and the
functions preprocessor.computeRawMel and preprocessor.normalizeFeatures when
making the change.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/mel-extended.test.mjs (2)

369-378: Unused variables nFramesFull and nFramesInc.

These variables are declared but never used in the comparison loop. Either remove them or use them if they were intended for a different iteration pattern.

♻️ Proposed fix
       // Compare features
-      const nFramesFull = fullResult.features.length / 128;
-      const nFramesInc = incResult.features.length / 128;
       let maxErr = 0;
       for (let i = 0; i < Math.min(fullResult.features.length, incResult.features.length); i++) {
         const err = Math.abs(fullResult.features[i] - incResult.features[i]);
         if (err > maxErr) maxErr = err;
       }

648-657: Consider a more specific assertion.

The assertion toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0) is quite weak. If the expected behavior for audio of length N_FFT is well-defined, consider asserting the exact expected frame count.

Comment on lines +192 to +207
it('should handle single frame (featuresLen=1) by outputting zeros', () => {
const audio = new Float32Array(160); // Exactly 1 frame worth of samples
for (let i = 0; i < audio.length; i++) {
audio[i] = Math.sin(2 * Math.PI * 440 * i / 16000);
}

const { rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen } = preprocessor.computeRawMel(audio);
if (featuresLen === 1) {
const normalized = preprocessor.normalizeFeatures(rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen);

// With single frame, normalization should output zeros (invStd = 0)
for (let i = 0; i < normalized.length; i++) {
expect(normalized[i]).toBe(0);
}
}
});
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Test assertions may be silently skipped when featuresLen !== 1.

The conditional if (featuresLen === 1) means the assertions might not execute if the audio length doesn't produce exactly one frame. Consider using expect(featuresLen).toBe(1) to fail explicitly if the precondition isn't met, or adjust the audio length to guarantee one frame.

🔧 Proposed fix
   it('should handle single frame (featuresLen=1) by outputting zeros', () => {
     const audio = new Float32Array(160); // Exactly 1 frame worth of samples
     for (let i = 0; i < audio.length; i++) {
       audio[i] = Math.sin(2 * Math.PI * 440 * i / 16000);
     }

     const { rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen } = preprocessor.computeRawMel(audio);
-    if (featuresLen === 1) {
-      const normalized = preprocessor.normalizeFeatures(rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen);
-
-      // With single frame, normalization should output zeros (invStd = 0)
-      for (let i = 0; i < normalized.length; i++) {
-        expect(normalized[i]).toBe(0);
-      }
-    }
+    expect(featuresLen).toBe(1); // Ensure precondition is met
+    const normalized = preprocessor.normalizeFeatures(rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen);
+
+    // With single frame, normalization should output zeros (invStd = 0)
+    for (let i = 0; i < normalized.length; i++) {
+      expect(normalized[i]).toBe(0);
+    }
   });
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
it('should handle single frame (featuresLen=1) by outputting zeros', () => {
const audio = new Float32Array(160); // Exactly 1 frame worth of samples
for (let i = 0; i < audio.length; i++) {
audio[i] = Math.sin(2 * Math.PI * 440 * i / 16000);
}
const { rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen } = preprocessor.computeRawMel(audio);
if (featuresLen === 1) {
const normalized = preprocessor.normalizeFeatures(rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen);
// With single frame, normalization should output zeros (invStd = 0)
for (let i = 0; i < normalized.length; i++) {
expect(normalized[i]).toBe(0);
}
}
});
it('should handle single frame (featuresLen=1) by outputting zeros', () => {
const audio = new Float32Array(160); // Exactly 1 frame worth of samples
for (let i = 0; i < audio.length; i++) {
audio[i] = Math.sin(2 * Math.PI * 440 * i / 16000);
}
const { rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen } = preprocessor.computeRawMel(audio);
expect(featuresLen).toBe(1); // Ensure precondition is met
const normalized = preprocessor.normalizeFeatures(rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen);
// With single frame, normalization should output zeros (invStd = 0)
for (let i = 0; i < normalized.length; i++) {
expect(normalized[i]).toBe(0);
}
});
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@tests/mel-extended.test.mjs` around lines 192 - 207, The test currently
guards assertions with a conditional on featuresLen, which can silently skip
assertions; replace the conditional check with an explicit assertion using
expect(featuresLen).toBe(1) right after calling
preprocessor.computeRawMel(audio), and then always call
preprocessor.normalizeFeatures(rawMel, nFrames, featuresLen) and run the
zero-checks on normalized so the test fails loudly when preconditions
(featuresLen === 1) aren't met; reference the variables/featuresLen and the
functions preprocessor.computeRawMel and preprocessor.normalizeFeatures when
making the change.

Comment on lines +636 to +639
const { features, length } = preprocessor.process(audio);
expect(length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
expect(features.length).toBe(nMels * (features.length / nMels));
}
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Tautological assertion always passes.

The assertion expect(features.length).toBe(nMels * (features.length / nMels)) is mathematically equivalent to expect(features.length).toBe(features.length) when the division is exact. Consider verifying against nMels * length instead.

🔧 Proposed fix
       const { features, length } = preprocessor.process(audio);
       expect(length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-      expect(features.length).toBe(nMels * (features.length / nMels));
+      expect(features.length).toBe(nMels * length);
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const { features, length } = preprocessor.process(audio);
expect(length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
expect(features.length).toBe(nMels * (features.length / nMels));
}
const { features, length } = preprocessor.process(audio);
expect(length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
expect(features.length).toBe(nMels * length);
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@tests/mel-extended.test.mjs` around lines 636 - 639, The test contains a
tautological assertion: replace the check of features length to validate it's
equal to nMels times the returned frame count; specifically, in the test that
destructures { features, length } from preprocessor.process(audio) and uses
nMels, change the assertion from expecting features.length to equal nMels *
(features.length / nMels) to expecting features.length toBe(nMels * length) so
it actually verifies features were produced for each mel bin per frame.

Copy link
Owner

@ysdede ysdede left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary: Tests fail on this PR because computeRawMel does not support startFrame on base.

Issue:
[tests/mel-extended.test.mjs:84] startFrame expectation fails; computeRawMel currently ignores startFrame, so frames 0..startFrame-1 are not zero.

Suggestion: Rebase on #29 (or include the startFrame implementation) or update the tests to match the current API. Then rerun npm test.

Tests: npm test (failed: tests/mel-extended.test.mjs)

@ysdede
Copy link
Owner

ysdede commented Feb 11, 2026

Code Review: Extended Unit Tests

The additional tests are comprehensive and cover important edge cases for the recent optimizations.

Findings:

Repository owner deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Feb 12, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant