fix: Address self-optimization workflow security and robustness (PR#135 review)#137
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
🚅 Environment reimagined-jupiter-pr-137 in gxq has no services deployed. |
…uplication (addresses PR#135 review) Co-authored-by: SMSDAO <144380926+SMSDAO@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: SMSDAO <144380926+SMSDAO@users.noreply.github.com>
Labels:
You can retry auto-merge once all conditions are met. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR addresses security and robustness issues from PR #135 review by pinning devDependencies, improving bash error handling, and enhancing workflow reliability. However, there are critical compatibility issues between the changed permissions and the commit workflow logic that will cause workflow failures.
Key Changes
- Pinned development tools (ts-prune, jscpd, eslint-plugin-complexity) to package.json
- Enhanced bash error handling with
set -euo pipefailin validation and analysis scripts - Reduced workflow permissions from
contents: writetocontents: read
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated 7 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| scripts/validate-dev-branch.sh | Added pipefail and undefined var checks, but grep logic for .env detection is inverted |
| scripts/analyze-dead-code.sh | Replaced grep-based detection with ts-prune, removed dynamic installs, added pipefail |
| scripts/analyze-coverage-gaps.js | Removed unused execSync and relativePath variables |
| package.json | Added pinned versions for ts-prune, jscpd, and eslint-plugin-complexity as devDependencies |
| .github/workflows/self-optimize.yml | Reduced permissions to read-only, but commit step will fail without write access |
| PR_135_FIXES.md | Documentation that inaccurately describes commit behavior given permission constraints |
Critical Issue: The workflow permission change to contents: read (line 12) is incompatible with the commit step (lines 242-265) which requires contents: write. The workflow will fail when ESLint finds fixable issues. Either restore write permissions for local commits or remove the commit step entirely.
|
|
||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: write | ||
| contents: read |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With contents: read permission (changed from contents: write), the "Commit automated fixes" step (lines 242-265) will fail when it tries to execute git commit (lines 249-256). Git requires write access to create commits.
Since auto-push is disabled per security review, either: (1) remove the entire commit step, or (2) restore contents: write if local commits (without push) are still desired for artifact generation. The current state will cause the workflow to fail when ESLint finds fixable issues.
Labels:
You can retry auto-merge once all conditions are met. |
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Addresses all 9 review comments from PR#135's copilot-pull-request-reviewer: supply-chain security vulnerabilities from dynamic npm installs, bash error handling gaps, and workflow reliability issues.
Supply-Chain Security
ts-prune@^0.10.3,jscpd@^4.0.5,eslint-plugin-complexity@^2.0.1)npm install --no-saveeliminated from scripts and workflowsnpm cifrom lockfile with exact versionsBash Script Robustness
set -e→set -euo pipefailin all bash scriptsrisky_patterns_foundnow only true when patterns actually detectedWorkflow Improvements
contents: writeandchecks: write(read-only where possible)Code Quality
execSyncandrelativePathfrom analyze-coverage-gaps.jsReview Comments Addressed
Documentation
Added
PR_135_FIXES.mdwith comprehensive implementation details.Note:
package-lock.jsonwill regenerate on first CI run with new dependencies.Original prompt
This pull request was created from Copilot chat.
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.