Skip to content

library_variable_has_codelist new metadata#1628

Merged
SFJohnson24 merged 10 commits intomainfrom
cg0011
Mar 12, 2026
Merged

library_variable_has_codelist new metadata#1628
SFJohnson24 merged 10 commits intomainfrom
cg0011

Conversation

@SFJohnson24
Copy link
Collaborator

this PR adds the new metadata requested from the parent issue to variable metadata with Library builders

@gerrycampion gerrycampion self-requested a review February 25, 2026 23:33
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing updates to test_define_variables_with_library_metadata

@SFJohnson24
Copy link
Collaborator Author

updated @gerrycampion

@RamilCDISC
Copy link
Collaborator

@SFJohnson24 do you think it would be a good idea to add 1 or 2 unit tests focused on extraction behavior from _links. Currently the updated tests verify propagation of column only.

@SFJohnson24
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@SFJohnson24 do you think it would be a good idea to add 1 or 2 unit tests focused on extraction behavior from _links. Currently the updated tests verify propagation of column only.

this would likely be done in test_sdtm_utils and not the builder. @RamilCDISC Do you want to make some coverage for the _link extraction using get_variables_metadata_from_standard in a separate PR?

@SFJohnson24 SFJohnson24 merged commit 1ee7be2 into main Mar 12, 2026
12 of 13 checks passed
@SFJohnson24 SFJohnson24 deleted the cg0011 branch March 12, 2026 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Suggestion to create 'library_variable_has_codelist' similar to 'define_variable_has_codelist'

3 participants