The number of IR nodes is configurable#327
Conversation
5865a00 to
2b24359
Compare
|
@cthulhu-rider Now it shows that it is running, although there are a lot of errors in the ir nodes. Can you check the configs and see if I'm doing everything right? |
2aa1fcc to
9cdbda6
Compare
|
@cthulhu-rider Everything works. However, after the launch, the following errors appear in the and in Which of these errors are not expected? |
and SN debug messages are np for now
IR bug, pls report
either an IR bug or setup problem. Report too just in case
most likely setup problem. Check that NeoFS contract is successfully deployed in the main chain and IR uses correct hash
IR should not attempt to do all these in the DevEnv Alphabetu shouldnt merge 2 setups in 1 config here, the list must equal Notaryforgot about this. Add |
Warn: `the attribute `version` is obsolete, it will be ignored, please remove it to avoid potential confusion`. Signed-off-by: Andrey Butusov <andrey@nspcc.io>
9cdbda6 to
a8639ac
Compare
|
All the errors above, except for SN debug and |
|
@End-rey dont forget to report bugs https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node |
a8639ac to
0a63e06
Compare
Before that, `neo-go` was used to invoke transactions, but now `neofs-adm` is conveniently used. Signed-off-by: Andrey Butusov <andrey@nspcc.io>
Use env variable `IR_NUMBER_OF_NODES` to configure 1, 4 or 7 IR nodes. Closes #73. Signed-off-by: Andrey Butusov <andrey@nspcc.io>
0a63e06 to
7fb1d2c
Compare
|
@End-rey pls upd README with new run abilities UPD: did not see u've updated |
|
my trial's summary Fetch and run right away
Switch to 43: ☑️ -3: ☑️ 4: 3 nodes devenv keep goin in 1X run mode, this is unexpected to me. On the other side, error was printed. Id prefer purely independent states. Some kind of 🛑 to me Clean prevoius runsand container successfully created. Switch to 7same cleaning. Works ☑️ Result
so, i like how it behaves and what abilities it provides enhancements i can suggest:
|
|
I think this boils down to ability to run independent devenvs of various kinds and requirement to |
carpawell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I looks like services/irX better be placed inside services/ir.
Closes #73.