Skip to content

Comments

Fake bump to test kms#837

Open
ardaguclu wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
ardaguclu:fake-bump
Open

Fake bump to test kms#837
ardaguclu wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
ardaguclu:fake-bump

Conversation

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 6, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Walkthrough

The go.mod file was updated: the required module github.com/openshift/api bumped to a newer pseudo-version, the single-line replace was expanded into a block, preserving the github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 mapping and adding a new github.com/openshift/library-go => fork replacement.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Module requirements
go.mod
Updated require for github.com/openshift/api from v0.0.0-20260126183958-606bd613f9f7 to v0.0.0-20260212193555-c06ab675261f.
Replace directive (module replacements)
go.mod
Converted single-line replace to a block. Kept github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 => github.com/openshift/onsi-ginkgo/v2 v2.6.1-0.20251001123353-fd5b1fb35db1 and added github.com/openshift/library-go => github.com/ardaguclu/library-go v0.0.0-20260217073437-5a7a2b2a33d9.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ardaguclu
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign liouk for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 8, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Feb 9, 2026
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 13, 2026
@ardaguclu ardaguclu marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2026 05:59
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 16, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ibihim and liouk February 16, 2026 06:01
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@go.mod`:
- Around line 134-137: The go.mod replace directive temporarily points
github.com/openshift/library-go to a personal fork
(github.com/ardaguclu/library-go); remove that replace entry (or change it to
the official module/version) so the project depends on the upstream
github.com/openshift/library-go instead of the personal fork, ensuring the
replace block no longer references github.com/ardaguclu/library-go.

Comment on lines 134 to 137
replace (
github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 => github.com/openshift/onsi-ginkgo/v2 v2.6.1-0.20251001123353-fd5b1fb35db1
github.com/openshift/library-go => github.com/ardaguclu/library-go v0.0.0-20260210063250-9351ccf4cb16
)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

# First, let's check the repository context and understand the go.mod file
pwd
git ls-files go.mod | head -20

Repository: openshift/cluster-authentication-operator

Length of output: 110


🏁 Script executed:

# Check the full go.mod file to understand the context
head -150 go.mod | tail -50

Repository: openshift/cluster-authentication-operator

Length of output: 2590


🏁 Script executed:

# Look for any PR metadata or documentation files
git ls-files | grep -E "(DESCRIPTION|PR|NOTES|TODO|README)" | head -20

Repository: openshift/cluster-authentication-operator

Length of output: 955


🏁 Script executed:

# Search for any comments or TODOs mentioning library-go or kms
rg -i "library-go|kms" --type md --type txt -A 2 -B 2

Repository: openshift/cluster-authentication-operator

Length of output: 15965


🏁 Script executed:

# Check git log for this specific change
git log --all --oneline --grep="library-go" -i | head -10
git log --all --oneline --grep="kms" -i | head -10

Repository: openshift/cluster-authentication-operator

Length of output: 1138


🏁 Script executed:

# Check if there are any CI/CD configuration files that might indicate test-only status
git ls-files | grep -E "(\.github|\.gitlab|\.circleci|Makefile|\.mk)" | head -20

Repository: openshift/cluster-authentication-operator

Length of output: 1099


🏁 Script executed:

# Check current branch and which branches contain this commit
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
git branch -a --contains 8fa97618

# Check the most recent commit on main/master
git log main --oneline -1 2>/dev/null || git log master --oneline -1

# Check if the replace directive change is in the current default branch
git show main:go.mod 2>/dev/null | grep -A 5 "^replace" || git show master:go.mod 2>/dev/null | grep -A 5 "^replace"

Repository: openshift/cluster-authentication-operator

Length of output: 289


🏁 Script executed:

# Check the status of the working directory to see if go.mod has uncommitted changes
git status go.mod

# Show the current go.mod replace directive
git show HEAD:go.mod | grep -A 5 "^replace"

Repository: openshift/cluster-authentication-operator

Length of output: 368


🏁 Script executed:

# Look for any PR or issue context that might indicate this is temporary
# Check for any TODO, FIXME, or comments about reverting this change
rg -i "TODO|FIXME|revert|temporary|temp" go.mod -B 3 -A 3
git log --all --grep="revert\|temporary\|temp" -i --oneline | grep -i library-go

Repository: openshift/cluster-authentication-operator

Length of output: 67


Remove personal fork replacement before merging to production.

The replace directive points github.com/openshift/library-go to a personal fork (github.com/ardaguclu/library-go). While the commit message confirms this is for testing KMS functionality, this must be reverted before merging to the master branch, as personal forks introduce security risks (potential supply chain vulnerabilities) and maintainability issues (forks may diverge from the official library). Ensure the original github.com/openshift/library-go is restored in the final version.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@go.mod` around lines 134 - 137, The go.mod replace directive temporarily
points github.com/openshift/library-go to a personal fork
(github.com/ardaguclu/library-go); remove that replace entry (or change it to
the official module/version) so the project depends on the upstream
github.com/openshift/library-go instead of the personal fork, ensuring the
replace block no longer references github.com/ardaguclu/library-go.

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-gcp-operator-encryption

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 19, 2026

@ardaguclu: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-rotation-serial-ote-1of2 c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-rotation-serial-ote-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-serial-ote-1of2 c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-serial-ote-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-parallel-ote c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-parallel-ote
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-serial-ote c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-serial-ote
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-kms-serial-ote-1of2 c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-kms-serial-ote-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-perf-serial-ote-1of2 c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-perf-serial-ote-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-rotation-serial-ote-2of2 c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-rotation-serial-ote-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-serial-ote-2of2 c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-serial-ote-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-kms-serial-ote-2of2 c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-kms-serial-ote-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-encryption-perf-serial-ote-2of2 c6334e4 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-encryption-perf-serial-ote-2of2

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants