Skip to content

fix: remove xfail; increase mcmc warmup#1774

Merged
janfb merged 8 commits intomainfrom
fix-cd-on-main
Feb 20, 2026
Merged

fix: remove xfail; increase mcmc warmup#1774
janfb merged 8 commits intomainfrom
fix-cd-on-main

Conversation

@janfb
Copy link
Contributor

@janfb janfb commented Feb 19, 2026

  • removing failing CD on main (one flaky test, one strict XFAIL due to the pytorch dependency change).
  • fix failing sbc tests by slightly increasing budget (MDN refactoring?)
  • fix lc2st tests on MPS device: skorch args were incorrect
  • fix numfocus badge.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 19, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@b546366). Learn more about missing BASE report.
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
sbi/diagnostics/lc2st.py 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1774   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   87.67%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      140           
  Lines           ?    12125           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?    10631           
  Misses          ?     1494           
  Partials        ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
fast 83.30% <83.33%> (?)
full 87.67% <83.33%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
sbi/samplers/vi/vi_utils.py 78.63% <100.00%> (ø)
sbi/diagnostics/lc2st.py 93.66% <75.00%> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

@manuelgloeckler manuelgloeckler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thanks for fixing.

],
ids=["loop", "scan"],
)
@pytest.mark.parametrize("mode", ["loop", pytest.param("scan")], ids=["loop", "scan"])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldnt, we still add an "skip" if e.g. someone uses torch < 2.5 ?

@janfb janfb merged commit 32ad86c into main Feb 20, 2026
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants