Enable test/analysis_options.yaml (issue #192) #214
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @xJac0b, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello! Gemini here, providing a summary of this pull request. This PR, authored by xJac0b, aims to address issue #192, which is titled "Enable test/analysis_options.yaml". Based on the changes presented in the patch, the primary focus is on adjusting the configuration for the custom_lint plugin. The configuration for this plugin is being moved from the library's internal lib/analysis_options.yaml file to the recommended user configuration example provided in the README.md. This change ensures that users who include solid_lints in their project's top-level analysis_options.yaml also correctly enable the necessary custom_lint plugin, which is essential for the custom lint rules to function, including potentially those intended for use with a test/analysis_options.yaml file.
Highlights
- Plugin Configuration Relocation: The configuration for the
custom_lintplugin (analyzer.plugins: - custom_lint) has been removed from the library'slib/analysis_options.yaml. - README Update for User Configuration: The
README.mdhas been updated to include theanalyzer.plugins: - custom_lintconfiguration in the exampleanalysis_options.yamlsnippet that users are instructed to include in their own projects. A note explaining this addition has also been added.
Changelog
- README.md
- Updated the main
analysis_options.yamlexample to include thecustom_lintplugin configuration underanalyzer.plugins(lines 27-29). - Added a note explaining the purpose of adding
custom_lintunderanalyzer.plugins(line 31).
- Updated the main
- lib/analysis_options.yaml
- Removed the
analyzer.plugins: - custom_lintconfiguration from the library's analysis options file (lines 2-3).
- Removed the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully addresses issue #192 by enabling the test-specific analysis options and updating the README to reflect the correct configuration steps. The changes are clear and directly address the stated objective.
Summary of Findings
- README clarity: A minor point regarding clarity in the README was identified (redundant text), but no comment was added as it was considered a low-severity issue, per the review settings.
Merge Readiness
The changes in this pull request appear correct and achieve the stated goal. There are no critical, high, or medium severity issues identified that would block merging. The PR looks ready to be merged. Please note that I am unable to approve the pull request directly; other reviewers should review and approve this code before merging.
| plugins: | ||
| - custom_lint |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I do not think we should change analysis_options.yaml here. The issue is about the analysis_options_test.yaml and its setup to work only for the test package of the end users.
Resolves #192